AKTA 593 KANUN PROSEDUR JENAYAH PDF

PINDAAN KEPADA KANUN TATACARA JENAYAH. Pindaan seksyen 2. 2. Kanun Tatacara Jenayah (Akta ], yang disebut “Kanun” dalam Bahagian ini. ADD TO CART; Icn heart02 off. domestic delivery FREE Shipping on orders over RM(Peninsular Malaysia) / RM(East Malaysia). N.B. While every. Malaysia largest bookstore offering books, magazines, music, CD, Manga and much more.

Author: Tautaxe Mim
Country: Colombia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 17 June 2013
Pages: 478
PDF File Size: 3.35 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.12 Mb
ISBN: 540-6-41129-132-7
Downloads: 13420
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrizilkree

To get the most out of this law bulletin and have full access to judgments and other materials, subscribe to CLJLaw today. Feel free to forward this bulletin to your colleagues.

Sign-up to receive this bulletin directly via email. Judicial review — Certiorari — Application to set aside decision of Strata Management Tribunal ‘Tribunal’ — Allegation that Tribunal breached rules of natural justice in hearing and determining claim — Whether Tribunal heard or considered merits of substantive claim — Whether claimant denied from making oral submissions — Whether Tribunal breached rules of natural justice when it did not inform claimant on law relied upon — Whether Tribunal lacked impartiality or acted in bad faith — Strata Management Act Strata title — Joint Management Body — Joint Management committee — Application to set aside decision of Strata Management Tribunal ‘Tribunal’ — Whether Tribunal heard or considered merits of substantive claim — Whether claimant denied from making oral submissions — Whether Tribunal breached rules of natural justice when it did not inform claimant on law relied upon — Whether Tribunal lacked impartiality or acted in bad faith — Strata Management Act Semakan – Permohonan untuk – Penyemakan keesahan dan kewajaran perintah hakim Mahkamah Sesyen yang memindahkan semula kes ke Mahkamah Sesyen yang lain – Kepentingan keadilan – Sama ada keputusan pemindahan semula kes adalah sah – Sama ada Mahkamah Seysen yang lain mempunyai bidangkuasa yang sama – Sama ada syarat di bawah s.

Kontrak pembinaan – Tuntutan untuk kerja-kerja yang telah disempurnakan – Tuntutan berasingan berikutan perubahan dalam kerja-kerja – Kewujudan arahan pertukaran berkenaan jenis bahan binaan – Jenis bahan binaan yang baru tidak dipersetujui oleh pihak-pihak di dalam kontrak asal – Kos tambahan dalam penyediaan bahan baru – Sama ada tuntutan berasingan berikutan arahan perubahan adalah wajar. Kontrak pembinaan – Kelewatan – Kelewatan dalam penyempurnaan kerja-kerja – Ganti rugi – Tuntutan ganti rugi jumlah tertentu – Kewujudan pengakuan kelewatan atas alasan perubahan cuaca dan arahan pemberhentian kerja – Sama ada terdapat sebab-sebab yang munasabah berkenaan kelewatan – Sama ada sesuatu pihak yang telah menyebabkan kelewatan dalam penyempurnaan kerja-kerja dalam tempoh masa yang telah ditetapkan wajar bertanggungan membayar ganti rugi seperti yang telah dipersetujui.

Striking out – Action – Time barred – Action to challenge land acquisition – Cause of action arose 28 years ago – Whether action maintainable – Whether plaintiffs action was time barred by virtue of s. Striking out – Action – Abuse of court process – Writ action commenced to challenge decision of public authority in relation to land acquisition – Action against public authority – Recovery of damages against government – Action to challenge notice of gazette – Remedies sought directly out of decision of public authority – Whether action maintainable – Whether action ought to be initiated by way of judicial review – Whether action was an abuse of court process.

Arrangement, scheme of – Court-sanctioned scheme – Validity of – Order made pursuant to s. Judicial review – Application for – Declaration to challenge restriction order – Application to quash findings of Prevention of Crime Board – Police restriction order issued in accordance with s. Mohd Hady Ya’akop v.

Sibu Slipway Sdn Bhd v. Ng See Chong v.

Akha judgment – Application for – Infringement of trade marks – First and second defendants did not enter appearance in suits – Whether judgment in default of defence should be entered against first and second defendants – Whether elements of infringement proven – Whether court could pierce company’s corporate veil – Special circumstances – Whether summary judgment ought to be entered against third pgosedur – Whether individual may be personally liable for company’s infringement of registered trade mark under s.

Winding up – Stay – Application for permanent stay of winding up orders pursuant to s. Illegality – Oral agreement – Claim for payments of commissions – Use of influence and good relationship to secure projects – Whether there were oral agreements between parties – Whether agreements to provide services to influence prosedut of public decision maker to award contract against public policy – Whether contractual consideration lawful – Whether oral agreements valid and enforceable – Contracts Actss.

  DR.D.S.KOTHARI - PDF

Police investigation – Remand order – Validity of order – Whether remand order obtained in compliance with s. Action for – Injury sustained by reason of breach of statutory duty – Remand order – Whether there was reasonable suspicion or sound basis for detention – Whether remand orders obtained in violation 953 procedures – Whether case of unlawful detention made out – Whether appellant entitled to damages aota Criminal Procedure Code, s.

Kanun Prosedur Jenayah (Akta 593) & Kaedah-Kaedah

Assessment – Appropriate basis of assessment – Loss of property – Damages for loss of property – Whether damages awarded for loss of property should be value of property at date tort was committed – Whether damages should be assessed on basis of value of property as at date of judgment Ng See Chong v. Trade marks – Registered trade mark – Infringement of – Whether elements of infringement proven – Whether court could pierce company’s corporate veil – Special circumstances – Whether individual may be personally liable for company’s infringement of registered trade mark under s.

Damages – Assessment – Loss of property – Damages for loss of property – Prsoedur damages awarded for loss of property should be value of property at date tort was committed – Whether damages should be assessed on basis of value of property as at date of judgment Ng See Chong v.

Negligence – Duty of care – Breach – Allegation of – Trespasser found dead in water tank causing contamination and injury to plaintiffs – Whether defendants owed duty of care to prevent action of third party – Whether there was special proeedur between plaintiffs and defendants – Whether duty imposed on defendants to guard elevated water tanks from deliberate action of trespasser – Whether defendants liable for abnormal deliberate act caused by trespasser – Whether reasonably foreseeable as probable that anyone would deliberately die in elevated water tank so as to contaminate water consumed by plaintiffs – Whether defendants’ liability established The President Of Majlis Perbandaran Tawau v.

Malayan Banking Bhd v. Perwaja Steel Sdn Kanuun v. Jurisdiction of court – High Court – Claim for maintenance of illegitimate child – Determination of paternity of child – Application by mother of child to compel alleged father to undergo DNA test – Whether court could utilise inherent jurisdiction or power to compel alleged father to undergo DNA test – Rules of CourtO.

Fundamental liberties – Equality before law – Right of pedigree – Federal Constitution, art. Appeal – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Accused person convicted of trafficking in drugs and sentenced to death – Whether conviction entered against accused under s.

Appeal – Appeal against sentence and conviction – Trafficking in dangerous jenaysh – Discovery of drugs proseedur car boot – Identity of drugs – Contradictory evidence of prosecution witnesses – Whether contradictions explained – Whether there was break in chain of evidence – Failure to call material witnesses – Whether adverse inference under s.

Prpsedur – Appeal by prosecution – Accused person charged for two counts of trafficking drugs – Dangerous Drugs Act – Accused person established to be in mens rea possession and had knowledge of drugs and act of carrying drugs was act of trafficking – Trial judge failed to invoke presumption under s.

Appeal – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Accused person charged for two counts of trafficking drugs – Dangerous Drugs Acts.

Preventive detention – Detention under Prevention of Crime Act – Report of inquiry officer – Service of report on akfa – Section prosesur 2 – Officer having custody of detainee to serve report forthwith – Meaning of ‘forthwith’ – Whether to mean ‘as soon as reasonably practicable’ – Interpretation Acts andnenayah.

Jurisdiction – Industrial Court – Claimants terminated from employment – Claimants not seeking reinstatement – Whether Industrial Court has jurisdiction over matter – Whether Minister correct in referring representation of claimants to Industrial Court – Industrial Relations Acts. Standard of proof – Civil action – Civil standard of proof for adultery – Fraud on spouse – Allegations of intimate relationship resulting in jenahah of child – Whether mother of child established prima facie case on balance of probabilities that there was close and intimate relationship prrosedur alleged father – Whether there existed sexual relationship that led to birth of child – Whether corroboration required in civil case – Evidence Acts.

  AOZORA INTERMEDIATE-ADVANCED JAPANESE COMMUNICATION PDF

Jurisdiction – Claimants not seeking reinstatement – Whether Industrial Court has jurisdiction over matter – Whether Minister correct in referring representation of claimants to Industrial Court – Industrial Relations Acts.

Prevention of Crime Act – Section 10 2 – Service of report of inquiry officer on detainee – Officer having custody of detainee to serve report forthwith – Meaning of ‘forthwith’ – Whether to mean ‘there and then’ or ‘immediate’ – Whether to mean ‘as soon as reasonably practicable’ – Interpretation Acts ands.

Conversion – Banker and customer – Customer opened and maintained foreign account with bank – Transacted money not debited from foreign account – Bank demanded for refund of overdrawn sum from customer – Customer failed to refund – Whether there was conversion of funds in account – Whether tort of prosecur applied to money in banking account – Whether bank entitled to claim sum as money had and received Malayan Banking Bhd v.

The defendants were Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan, respectively the former second-in-command and head of state of the Khmer Rouge regime. The case was concerned with crimes committed in the course of forced population transfers, and against officials of menayah former ‘Lon Nol’ Khmer Republic regime, after the fall of Phnom Penh on 17 April She is currently undertaking death penalty research for an honours year in the School of International Relations at the ANU.

Setelah kejatuhan Kesultanan Melayu Melaka, kannun Melayu bekas jajahan takluknya masih terus memakai undang-undang keterangan syariah dan adat di semua mahkamah sebagaimana termaktub dalam Undang-undang Pahang yang sama peruntukannya dengan HKM.

Malah sebelum kedatangan pengaruh Inggeris, undang-undang keterangan syariah dan adat dipakai di semua mahkamah di negeri-negeri Melayu kerana semasa itu tidak berlaku pengasingan dalam struktur mahkamah. Undang-undang substantif dan acara, termasuk keterangan, semuanya berasaskan undang-undang Islam dan adat. Reply to defence is defined as ‘a statement of case served by the plaintiff in a civil action in answer to the defence.

The reason for serving a reply to a statement of defence is because the plaintiff feels that it is necessary to further explain the issues prsoedur the parties as pleaded in the statement of claim and statement of defence.

Reply to statement of defence is normally filed if the contents of the statement of defence had raised certain kanhn that required to be answered better. Filing a reply to a statement of defence is optional, unlike a statement of claim and statement of defence.

Reply to a statement of defence arises in different situations.

CLJ Bulletin #29/ (20 July )

For instance, a reply will be filed when the statement of defence had raised a point for the first time that requires clarification or explanation from the plaintiff. The plaintiff will file a reply to the statement of defence when some new matter may have arisen as a jenatah and relevant result of something that has been pleaded in the defence. To view previous issues of the CLJ Bulletin, Click here If you no longer wish xkta receive this email in the future, you may unsubscribe.

Back to Top Print this page. Kontrak proxedur – Tuntutan untuk kerja-kerja yang telah disempurnakan – Tuntutan berasingan berikutan perubahan dalam kerja-kerja – Kewujudan arahan pertukaran berkenaan jenis bahan binaan – Jenis bahan binaan yang baru tidak dipersetujui oleh pihak-pihak di dalam kontrak asal – Kos tambahan dalam penyediaan bahan baru – Sama ada tuntutan berasingan berikutan jenayay perubahan adalah wajar KONTRAK: Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.

Sexual Offences Against Children Act Tourism Tax Act Self-Employment Social Security Act Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia Act Strategic Trade Amendment Act Penal Code Amendment Act Bankruptcy Amendment Act Consumer Protection Amendment Act Legal Profession Disciplinary Proceedings Rules Customs Duties Amendment No.