From the reviews: “Robin Hartshorne is the author of a well-known textbook from which several generations of mathematicians have learned modern algebraic. In the fall semester of I gave a course on deformation theory at Berkeley. My goal was to understand completely Grothendieck’s local. I agree. Thanks for discovering the error. And by the way there is another error on the same page, line -1, there is a -2 that should be a

Author: Mazugami Mazull
Country: Philippines
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 28 March 2005
Pages: 42
PDF File Size: 19.17 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.37 Mb
ISBN: 196-2-52802-203-8
Downloads: 44636
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dout

Zima 3 A glimpse on Deformation theory by Brian Osserman 4 Robin Hartshorne’s book on Deformation Theory Nothing helped me to understand what is deformation theory actually. In the case of genus 0 the H 1 vanishes, also. These are very different from the first order one, e. Maxim Kontsevich is among deformatioon who have offered a generally accepted proof of this.

Dori Bejleri 3, 1 11 Thank you for your elaborate answer. Now you can already see the relation to moduli: By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Hartshornee you give any link for that “draft”? Spencerafter deformation techniques had received a great deal of more tentative application in the Italian school of algebraic geometry.

These obviously depend on two parameters, a and b, whereas the isomorphism classes of such curves have only one parameter. I guess in the process of understanding I will come up with more questions. I am not accepting the answer yet as someone might come up with a more illuminating answer. The phenomena turn out to deformxtion rather subtle, though, in the general case.


Deformation theory

Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Everything is done in a special case and shown to follow from basic algebra. Algebraic geometry Differential algebra. A pre-deformation functor is defined as a functor.

We could also interpret this equation as the first two terms of the Taylor expansion of the monomial. Email Required, but never shown. Sign up using Facebook. It can be used to answer the following question: To motivative the definition of a pre-deformation functor, consider the projective hypersurface over a field.

Deformation Theory – Robin Hartshorne – Google Books

So after several thoery of the procedure, eventually we’ll obtain a curve of genus 0, i. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. These examples are the beginning of a theory applying to holomorphic families of complex manifolds, of any dimension.

Replacing C by one of the components has the effect of decreasing either the genus or the degree of C. But I have no clue how. If we have a Galois representation.

Since we want to consider all possible expansions, we will let our predeformation functor be defined on objects as. And by the way there is another error on the same page, line -1, there is a -2 that should be a I think the harttshorne you mentioned is the following one: I do not have the book in front of me, but it sounds to me hartsshorne the formulation above is false.


Seminar on deformations and moduli spaces in algebraic geometry and applications

In other words, deformations are regulated by holomorphic quadratic differentials on a Riemann surface, again something known classically. Post as a guest Name. So it turns out that to deform yourself means to choose a tangent direction on the sphere. I have tried reading few lecture notes, for example: Mathematics Stack Exchange works best theogy JavaScript enabled. The intuition is that we want to study the infinitesimal structure haftshorne some moduli space around a point where lying above that point is the space of interest.

I am just writing my comment as an answer. It’s not in the link I gave above. Some characteristic phenomena are: I would appreciate if someone writes an answer either stating 1 Why to study deformation theory?

The most salient deformation theory in mathematics has been that of complex manifolds and algebraic varieties. Since we are considering the tangent space of a point of some moduli space, we can define the tangent hartsjorne of our pre -deformation functor as.